In our recent group coaching session, we approached a topic that no one really wants to draw too close to. One brave woman shared how sometimes life doesn’t look like you thought it would because illness changes the shape of everything you once knew and everything you imagined for the future.

Two people who once moved through the world shoulder to shoulder, carrying equal weight in familiar ways, suddenly find themselves standing on different terrain. One remembers more quickly. One processes more slowly. One begins quietly compensating for what the other can no longer reliably carry. At first, the adjustments are so subtle they can almost be mistaken for ordinary aging or fatigue. A repeated story. A missed detail. A forgotten direction. A husband who used to effortlessly navigate crowded conversations is now growing quiet in noisy rooms. A wife instinctively steps in to smooth transitions before anyone else notices.

And because love is protective, she tells herself this is temporary. Manageable. Explainable. Then, one day, she realizes she is no longer simply accompanying him through life. She is holding part of life together for him.

I’m still in awe of the vulnerability and courage my friend showed when she brought her experiences of accompanying her husband through the early stages of cognitive decline to coaching. Their lives are still deeply beautiful. They pray together. Exercise together. Serve together. They have spent years guiding converts into the Church, and their shared ministry has become part of the architecture of their marriage. But during this year’s Easter Vigil, something became painfully clear.

The demands of Holy Week had asked too much of him, and the ministry they knew so well exceeded his capacity. If you understand anything about parish life during Holy Week, you get it. There had been preparation beforehand, disrupted routines, long hours, overstimulation, late nights, emotional intensity, endless interactions. By the time the Vigil Mass began late Saturday evening, he simply could not stay awake. He slept through much of it.

What struck me most deeply was not her frustration. There was very little frustration in her telling of the story. In fact, she spoke with remarkable tenderness. She understood that he was vulnerable. She understood fatigue. What grieved her was something else entirely: she realized she could no longer divide herself between ministry and caregiving as she once had.

In previous years, she might have spent long stretches talking with students or helping coordinate details, while he carried out his own role independently during the evening. But now, if she disappeared into another room for two hours, he became confused and disoriented. Her presence itself had become stabilizing for him. He could still participate beautifully, but increasingly, he needed to participate beside her. (I have deliberately emphasized that thought so you can stop and recognize its magnitude.)

And just as the enormity of it settles in, there comes another recognition, or another nagging set of questions she can ask herself:

Am I failing to adjust to reality quickly enough? Am I doing enough to help him succeed?

Last year, a friend of hers noticed signs that something was wrong. She gently gave voice to concerns. This year, the undeniable question the wife posed to herself was whether she was still operating under last year’s assumptions. She had adjusted beautifully inside their home. She no longer assumed he would remember conversations. She handled more of the driving. She scaffolded daily life in practical ways. But in public, some part of her was still trying to preserve the illusion that nothing had changed.

That distinction matters more than we often realize. There is a difference between protecting dignity and protecting the illusion that nothing has changed. Those are not the same thing. One preserves a person’s identity as a human created in the image and likeness of God. The other eventually becomes impossible. It sets the well-intentioned caregiver up for certain failure.

I think many women understand this instinctively, even outside the context of illness. We spend enormous amounts of energy trying to preserve normalcy for the people we love. We smooth over. Anticipate. Absorb. Translate. Adjust quietly behind the scenes so that everyone else can continue moving comfortably through the world. We become managers of emotional weather systems. Curators of continuity. Guardians of the familiar.

But eventually, life introduces realities that cannot be managed back into submission. Illness. Aging. Estrangement. Grief. Limitations. Exhaustion. The loss of old roles. The loss of old capacities. The loss of the marriage as it once functioned. And often, the suffering deepens when we keep measuring ourselves against an outdated version of reality.

This woman’s deepest pain was not actually logistical. It was relational. She was grieving the loss of the mutuality that once existed between them. She missed the husband who could independently co-carry the ministry load, process quickly in social settings, and navigate demanding environments without her constant awareness. She missed having someone who could fully share the invisible mental labor. And frankly, now she is without someone to lean on when she is weary.

Caregiving for cognitive decline is particularly exhausting because so much of the work is invisible. It is not simply helping someone remember appointments or handing over car keys. It is, in many ways, becoming an external executive functioning system. It is constantly monitoring orientation, processing speed, fatigue, stimulation, emotional regulation, transitions, confusion, and social dynamics. It is carrying continuity for two people at once.

And because labor is invisible, caregivers often do not recognize how much they themselves are becoming depleted. One woman in the conversation described caring for her father and constantly feeling guilty whenever she made a decision that was not the “optimal” one for him. Sometimes she allowed independence simply because she no longer had the energy to manage the consequences of doing everything perfectly. Another woman observed gently that sometimes the person who needs protecting still believes he can do everything he once did. Another reflected on the grief of accepting a “new normal” and learning to find joy there rather than continually comparing life to what used to be.

That phrase rang throughout the conversation: the new normal. Not because it is tidy or comforting. It is neither. Usually, we do not want to embrace the new normal. We would much prefer the old normal.

But accepting a new normal is often the beginning of tenderness instead of panic. It is the beginning of adaptation instead of exhaustion. It heralds the beginning of functioning well within reality rather than managing ongoing performance.

At one point, I challenged her to consider and name how she was made for the challenge in front of her and how she was uniquely equipped to live it out well.

She pointed to God’s grace. And then she kind of stopped. When pressed to recognize her own virtues and her own capabilities, she was stumped. So I invited the other women in the group to contribute. What emerged was one of the most beautiful moments I have witnessed in a long time. They did not offer productivity advice or platitudes. They named what they saw in her.

They saw attentiveness.

Patience.

Courage.

Honesty.

Fortitude.

They saw a woman willing to face reality without running from it. A woman learning to love someone through changing terrain. A woman carrying an enormous mental load, not because she is controlling, but because she is devoted.

One young woman said something I have not stopped thinking about since:

“God gave you so many years of marriage to know your husband and yourself so deeply. Your heart has been being prepared from the start.”

I think that is true of many difficult vocations in life. We are rarely “made” for them in a single dramatic moment. We are slowly shaped by years of ordinary faithfulness. Through shared meals and inside jokes and disappointments and reconciliations and prayers whispered half-asleep beside someone we have loved for decades. Often, long marriages build deep familiarity long before they require deep sacrifice.

And perhaps this is one of the hidden truths of enduring love: eventually, nearly every marriage asks us to become students of one another’s weakness, not just one another’s strengths. We are called to the ministry of a lifetime, to love the weakest version of each other, not just the polished and capable versions of ourselves. We soothe the frightened versions. We support the aging versions. We compensate for the diminished versions. We offer refuge and rest to the exhausted versions. And yes, we sometimes stagger under the weight of the versions that cannot carry what they once carried.

Read more

Some mornings, you feel defeated and overwhelmed before you even open your eyes. Today’s coaching was about mornings like that and the afternoons that follow them. It was about wondering why we’re yelling even when we’re living a life we always wanted.

So here you are. You open your eyes already behind. Before your thoughts can gather, before your body has fully returned from sleep, there are voices, needs, hands, and questions. The day does not wait for you to arrive inside it. It claims you immediately. There is no threshold, no gentle crossing from rest into responsibility. There is only demand. Crushing, overwhelming demand.

And then, sometime later—often not very much later—you hear your own voice rising in a way you do not like. You feel the sharpness of it even as it leaves your mouth. You see it reflected in the faces before you. And almost instantly, the second wave comes: the shame, the discouragement, the agonizing question that settles in your chest.

Why am I yelling?

It is a question asked by good women, attentive mothers, thoughtful people who care deeply about the atmosphere of their homes and the shape of their own souls. It is rarely asked by those who are indifferent. It is almost always asked by those who are trying very hard. Striving to be good wives and mothers. But the question, as it is usually posed, focuses in the wrong direction.

It assumes that the problem is primarily moral or volitional. It assumes that somewhere, at the center of the moment, there was a clean, clear choice to be made—and that you failed to choose well. It rarely accounts for what actually precedes the moment.

The inevitable wave of shame fails to acknowledge the exhaustion that has been steadily accumulating, day after day, without sufficient repair. It doesn’t consider the sleep that has been fractured or shortened every night for as long as you can remember. It offers no empathy for the body that has not had a chance to come fully back to itself before being needed again. There is no accounting of the steady, unrelenting stream of small demands that, taken individually, are reasonable and even good, but taken together begin to exceed capacity.

Perhaps most of all, it fails to notice the absence of a recollected beginning. And so, the shame is nothing but detrimental, and the downward spiral is even more overwhelming than the constant touching, talking, and demanding.

There is a profound difference between entering a day and being entered by it. Consider that statement. Doesn’t “being entered by it” sound like an assault? Most of us have known both scenarios, even if we have not named them. There are mornings when we rise, gather ourselves, and step into what lies ahead with some measure of interior presence. And there are mornings when we are immediately overtaken, when our bodies are touched, our attention claimed, our energy drawn from us before we have had any opportunity to orient ourselves. The noise of the day crashes around us in half a dozen different ways. It is very difficult to be calm when you are assaulted before you have fully arrived.

This is where the conversation must change, if it is going to bear any real fruit.

Instead of asking, “Why am I yelling?” we begin to ask, “What is happening to me right before I yell?”

When that question is allowed to open honestly and to be examined without the distortion of shame, the answers are often not surprising. There is a point, sometimes subtle, sometimes unmistakable, when the body begins to tighten. The jaw sets. The shoulders rise. The mind begins to race ahead, trying to solve multiple problems at once, while also registering, often beneath the surface, a sense of being trapped inside the moment.

There may be a thought that passes quickly but carries real weight: I cannot take this. I cannot do this well.

By the time the voice rises, the system is already well past its threshold. The escalation is not the beginning of the problem. It is the discharge of it. It’s the system filled to beyond its capacity, bubbling over.

If we want something to change, we cannot focus our attention solely on the moment of yelling. We have to move slightly earlier in time, to that first tightening, that first sense of overwhelm, that first inward surge. Not to eliminate it—that would be unrealistic—but to meet it in a different way.

This is delicate work because it requires a shift from control to awareness. The instinct, especially in a chaotic environment, is to try to manage everything quickly and efficiently, to bring order by force of will. But regulation does not come from control. It comes from a brief return to oneself. It comes from seeking the source of all grace.

Sometimes that return is very small. It may be as simple as pausing for a breath before speaking, or allowing the body to lean back instead of forward, or saying a single sentence that interrupts the momentum of the moment without trying to resolve it.

“I need a minute.”

I need a minute to connect with my Creator. I need a minute to remember that even as I juggle to hold all of them, I am held by my Lord.

It is not a complete solution. It is a small boundary. But it is often enough to prevent the immediate surge into something harsher.

Underneath all of this, however, there is another layer that deserves attention, as it is often the layer that has steadily fueled the reaction's intensity over time. It is the experience of not belonging to oneself.

When a day begins without any protected space, without even a few moments in which one’s own body and attention are not immediately claimed by others, something essential is missing. There is no opportunity to gather, to orient, to remember who one is before becoming what everyone else needs. Over time, this absence begins to register not only as exhaustion, but as resentment.

It is not always spoken, and when it is, it is often softened or dismissed quickly. But it is real. It arises in the observation that someone else in your family can move through the morning with a degree of autonomy that is not available to you. It arises in the sense that your own needs must wait indefinitely, while the needs around you present themselves with urgency and persistence. Resentment, in this context, is not a sign of failure. It is a signal. It points to a lack of structure that would allow you to remain a fully present, recollected human in your own life.

Read more

In the deep stretch of winter, months ago now, we began with careful study of the Book of Ruth. As Lent approached, that study unfolded into a series of workshops, each one growing out of the shared story of loss and new life in Naomi and Ruth.

During Lent, we learned how to stay. We learned how not to run from grief. We saw how we were over-functioning in fear. And we began to endeavor to love without controlling outcomes. Progress was made, to be sure.

Today’s workshop was firmly rooted in Easter. Easter asks something new of us.

Not: Can you endure?
But: Will you live again?

And if we are honest, that question can feel far more vulnerable than the suffering that came before.

Because to live again is not merely to continue to exist in this world; it is to move forward. To do that requires, in some sense, loosening our grip on what we have lost. It is to turn, however slightly, away from the life we loved—the person, the relationship, the vision we carried so carefully—and to admit that what is ahead will not be a restoration of that past, but something altogether different.

We do not resist suffering as much as we imagine we do. Many of us have learned how to endure. We have learned how to stay, especially when we think that this, too, shall pass and life will return to “normal.” But receiving a changed life we did not plan? That is another matter entirely.

Resurrection Is Not Reversal

We often speak of resurrection as if it were a return, a recovery of what has been taken from us. But Scripture does not present it that way. Resurrection is not the undoing of loss. It is the beginning of something new. And sometimes that new life unfolds alongside what has not been restored.

This is where the tension lives, and it is here that many of us become quietly stuck. We are willing to carry what has been lost, but we hesitate to receive what is being given because it does not resemble what we once hoped for.

The Book of Ruth offers a strikingly honest picture of this reality. Long before Naomi holds Obed in her arms, before any sense of renewal appears, there is a quieter, more hidden moment that must take place.

She lets Orpah go.

Then they lifted up their voices and wept again. And Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her.

And she said, “See, your sister-in-law has gone back to her people and to her gods; return after your sister-in-law.” (Ruth 1:14-15)

There is no confrontation, no persuasion, no attempt to secure a different outcome. Orpah chooses a different path, and Naomi does not stand in her way. She does not reinterpret the moment as her failure, nor does she chase after what has already turned away. It is important to note that carefully: Scripture does not frame Orpah’s leaving as Naomi’s failure. And that is so, so important.

It is a simple scene, easy to overlook. We’re focused on Ruth and what she does. But Orpah’s decision carries one of the most difficult truths of the spiritual life: love can be offered freely, but it cannot compel a response. People can and do turn away.

There are relationships in every life that echo this moment. Places where we showed up with sincerity, where we loved well, where we extended ourselves honestly—and still, the other person chose distance. Sometimes it is a quiet drifting apart. Sometimes it is more definitive, more painful. A door closes. A conversation ends. A connection is severed.

And the questions come, as they always do. What did I do wrong? What could I have said differently? What might I still repair?

But again, Scripture does not frame Orpah’s leaving as Naomi’s failure. It simply acknowledges that not everyone continues forward into the same future.

To accept that is not to become indifferent. It is to begin learning a different kind of love.

Read more

I spent the weekend with my two-year-old granddaughter. She is utterly delightful and incredibly verbal. It was a refresher course in fairy tales. She knows them all and insists that they run like lovely pink ribbons through her life.

I remember when happily-ever-after was my narrative. I remember that my dad gave me a Cinderella Lladro as a wedding gift, and I thought it was the absolutely perfect symbol of how well he understood me.

But he didn’t live to know the other me, the one who has lived long enough to know that we don’t just encounter one trauma, survive, and live happily ever after. After we’ve lived a good bit of life, we are no longer tempted to believe in fairy tales.

We know better than to expect the neat resolution, the final scene tied up in a bow after the long struggle of the middle. Life does not move that way. It breaks patterns. It interrupts itself. It wounds in places we didn’t know were exposed or even a little bit vulnerable.

Life is hard. And then, very often, it is hard again. And so the question shifts. It deepens. It becomes more difficult to ask.

We move from asking: How do I live once I am safe again, how do I lean into the happy at the arc of the story?

To: How do I live when I know, with certainty, that I am not—and never will be—fully safe in this world, that my story is not a tidy arc that ends in happily ever after?

There are some losses that resolve, or at least soften at the edges. But there are others that do not resolve. They do not come to a neat and tidy close, and they certainly do not return you to what was before. There is destruction, and then, instead, they redefine the landscape of your life.

A parent dies, and another remains, and you know—now in a way you didn’t before—that this, too, will happen again. You brace for it.

Estrangement comes without reconciliation. You learn that a child can wound you again and again, not only in the great milestones that should have been celebrations, but in the quiet, ordinary moments that should have been safe and happy everyday life. You begin to understand (and to worry) that nothing prevents it from happening again, perhaps even with another child.

Friendship fractures. Betrayal teaches you what human beings are capable of.

Work disappears at a stage of life when you thought it would be secure, and the doors that once opened do not open as easily now. The trajectory of the future is suddenly much less linear.

In these places, the danger persists. It becomes part of the new and unfamiliar terrain. The thing is, we are called to live here.

Why Survival Mode Persists

When the world proves itself to be both fragile and dangerous, your nervous system does something truly intelligent, something essential to self-preservation.

It stays alert.

It scans, it anticipates, it braces—looking for a pattern. Your nervous system begins to assume that distress is not an interruption to your happy life, but the recurring reality of a rollercoaster life. Survival mode is no longer about getting through a moment. It becomes a way of being.

You are not overreacting. You are responding to what you now know is true:

People can and do leave.
Bodies fail.
Relationships fracture.
Security can dissolve.

The question is not whether these things are real. They are absolutely real. And we learn that they can come in multiples and make you feel as if you’re living in a modern-day version of the Book of Job.

Read more

Today, we had a group coaching session, where we had a chance to put principles into practice. First, a quick review. In the coaching workshop before Easter, we identified something that many women recognize the moment they hear it, even if they’ve never had language for it before. There are two ways of loving:

One is biblically grounded covenant love. It is stable and rooted in who we are before God, not in how the other person is responding. It allows the other person to remain responsible for themselves.

The other is over-functioning. It can look and sound like love. And it often feels like love, in part, because it costs so much. But it is driven by anxiety.

If I do enough…
If I say this right…
If I try one more time…

Maybe this will turn out okay.

This is the kind of love that leads directly to burnout. Further, it’s a great way to begin to confuse exhaustion with holiness.

Seeing It Clearly (Before Trying to Fix It)

In the workshop, before we tried to change anything, we practiced simply noticing.

Where does love in my life begin to shift into control?

The signs are not subtle once you know how to look for them:

• You feel anxious when things are unresolved.

• Your peace depends on someone else’s behavior.

• You replay conversations, trying to find the right wording after the fact.

• You feel responsible not only for what you said, but for how they feel about what you said.

And then the over-functioning behavior follows. You reach out again… and again… without response. You explain more than is necessary. You carry things that are not actually yours to carry. You try—not just to address a situation—but to manage someone else’s reaction to it.

Underneath all of this is a thought pattern that sounds almost virtuous:

I can’t just do nothing.
This is my responsibility.
This is what love requires.

And then, most subtly of all, a spiritual distortion begins to take hold.

I’m just being selfless.
I’m laying down my life.

But we paused there, because this is where clarity is essential.

Read more

There is a distinct kind of exhaustion that comes from carrying too much that was never ours to carry in the first place. It is that burnout we know and talk about so often. It is the fatigue of loving with clenched hands, of trying to secure outcomes that remain stubbornly beyond our reach, of replaying conversations long after they have ended and rehearsing words that will never quite land the way we hope. Many women live here—in this chronic exhaustion —for decades. They show up. They remain faithful. They do love deeply. And yet beneath all of it runs a current of strain, as if love itself has become a kind of labor that never resolves.

It is into that interior landscape that the book of Ruth speaks with surprising precision.

We often approach Ruth as a gentle story, a pastoral interlude in the Old Testament. But if we linger over the opening chapter, we find a woman standing in circumstances as stark as Naomi’s: widowed, culturally and geographically uprooted, economically vulnerable, and facing a future that offers no clear promise of restoration. Ruth has every reason to grasp for certainty, to negotiate her way into safety, to manipulate circumstances, to attach her love to a guarantee of how things will turn out.

Instead, she speaks words of simple surrender that are astonishing: “Where you go I will go… your people shall be my people, and your God my God.” She does not attach conditions to her love. She does not say, “I will stay if this works.” She binds herself in fidelity without requiring an outcome.

That distinction—so easy to admire, so difficult to live—reveals a fault line that runs through many of our relationships.

We tend to assume that anything sacrificial must be love. If it costs us something, if it stretches us, if it exhausts us, then surely it must be holy. And yet, not all sacrifice is rightly ordered. Not all giving is grounded. There is a way of loving that is steady, clear, and rooted in God, and there is a way of loving that is anxious, urgent, and quietly trying to manage what cannot be managed.

Ruth shows us the first. Most of us, at least at times, slip into the second.

The difference is not always obvious from the outside. From the outside, it looks efficient and generous. In fact, over-functioning often disguises itself as virtue. It looks like attentiveness, responsibility, and magnanimity. It even feels like care. But underneath, it is driven less by freedom than by fear—fear of loss, fear of failure, fear that if we do not hold everything together, it will all fall apart.

The signs are often interior before they are visible. Your mind cannot rest when something is unresolved. Your emotional life rises and falls with another person’s behavior. You have a habit of replaying conversations. Likewise, you rehearse conversations before they take place, searching for the right phrasing that might finally produce the desired response. You shoulder a subtle but persistent sense of responsibility for how someone else feels, chooses, or heals.

From there, the behaviors follow. Another message sent after silence. Another attempt to clarify what has already been said. Another effort to anticipate and prevent an outcome that has not yet occurred. The instinct to justify, argue, defend, and explain over and over again. The assumption that if you could just do this one thing better—speak more gently, explain more clearly, anticipate more carefully—everything might finally settle into place.

Even our spiritual language can reinforce the pattern. We tell ourselves we are being selfless, that this is what love requires, that we are laying down our lives. And yet, somewhere along the way, the line between self-gift and self-erasure begins to blur. Laying down your life looks more like killing yourself. The Gospel calls us to pour ourselves out in love, but it never asks us to assume responsibility for what belongs to God alone. To lay down one’s life is not to abandon one’s dignity. It is not to pummel ourselves into submission trying to make someone else behave a certain way. It is not to take on the burden of outcomes that remain, by their very nature, beyond human control.

This is where Ruth’s example becomes not only beautiful but also instructive.

When the scene shifts into the second chapter, the narrative grows almost pastoral—it’s a gentle scene in a small agricultural setting. There are no dramatic declarations, no visible miracles, no sudden reversals of fortune. Ruth simply wakes, recognizes a need, and goes to glean in the fields. She does not set out to secure her future or to search for a redeemer. She goes to gather food.

The text tells us that she “happened” to come to the part of the field belonging to Boaz. It is a moment in Scripture where the language of coincidence is used to reveal providence. Ruth is not orchestrating her redemption. She is acting faithfully within the limits of what she can see. And God is arranging what she cannot.

This is a profoundly different posture from the one many of us inhabit.

Ruth’s life in this chapter is marked by a kind of steadiness that is easy to overlook because it is so unremarkable. She shows up. She works. She receives what is given. She does not demand reassurance. She does not attempt to secure the ending. She participates in the story without trying to control it.

There is a clarity to her action that feels almost foreign in a culture accustomed to urgency. She does what is hers to do and stops there. She does not expand her responsibility beyond its proper boundaries. She does not attempt to carry Naomi’s grief for her. She does not try to force provision before it is offered. Her presence is steady, but it is not grasping, clutching, or tightening.

This is what grounded love looks like in real life.

It is a presence that remains without hovering, that accompanies without managing. It is the ability to stand in a relationship without either withdrawing in self-protection or overreaching in anxiety. It says, quietly but firmly, “I am here,” without adding, “and I need this to resolve in a particular way.”

It is also marked by clarity of action. Ruth does not collapse into passivity under the weight of uncertainty. She moves. She works. She engages reality as it is. But her action is proportionate and measured. It is not driven by the need to control the future, but by the recognition of what is required in the present moment.

And perhaps most strikingly, there is an interior steadiness to her life—a steadiness of soul. This does not mean she feels no fear, no grief, no uncertainty. It means that her actions are not dictated by those emotions. She is not pulled back and forth by every shift in circumstance. She continues with faith.

All of this is undergirded by something even deeper: a quiet trust in the unseen work of God.

Ruth has no awareness, in that moment, of where this path will lead. She does not know that Boaz is a kinsman-redeemer. She does not know that her ordinary faithfulness is part of a story that will extend far beyond her own lifetime. She is living inside a narrative whose full shape is hidden from her.

And yet, she remains faithful within it. What does that look like for us, practically speaking? Spiritually speaking?

Read more

After last week’s workshop, we decided to take some time to delve more deeply into the themes of the first two coaching workshops—It Didn’t Turn Out the Way I Thought It Would and Fear of Further Loss. I wanted to offer time and space for individual stories and some more specific coaching. We seized that opportunity today.

Today, there is a story of what happened, and then there is the story that really wanted to be told. At first, the details were recounted in orderly fragments. It all unfolds, if you will. Dates are named. Diagnoses are explained. The necessary logistics are laid out with care—who drove where, who called whom, what needed to be done next. These details offer a kind of temporary steadiness, as though suffering might be contained if it can be arranged neatly enough.

But then something shifts. What might sound, on the surface, like rambling is often something far more significant. Beneath the words, something is pressing upward—not information, but meaning. It wants us to lift the corner of the blanket (of grief, in this case), and discover what lies beneath.

The woman who shared today began by recounting the last three weeks of her life. In that brief span of time, her aunt suffered a serious stroke. Her uncle, already fragile, declined quickly and died. A caregiving role she had shared for years shifted, suddenly and entirely, onto her shoulders. What had already been heavy became heavier. What had been borne together became hers alone to carry. She told the story with care at first, then with increasing urgency, and eventually all at once, as though the telling itself might relieve the pressure building within her.

At a certain point, however, it became clear that what she was trying to express could not be contained within the sequence of events. So we paused, not to interrupt her, but to help her find herself within the story she was telling. Because when grief accelerates—when multiple losses collapse into a single, disorienting season of loss—the human mind does what it was created to do. It begins to search for pattern, for explanation, for some form of coherence that might render the pain intelligible. It wants desperately to make sense of it all—and story is how ew find meaning.

It is here that something subtle and consequential occurs. The question is no longer simply what happened. Almost without our noticing, there is an urgent need to know what this means about the way the world works.

The Stories We Begin to Tell

As she continued, another layer surfaced. Her uncle had been a good man—patient, steady, quietly faithful in ways that often go unnoticed. He had spent decades loving a difficult wife, enduring more than most people ever saw. Yet in the end, there had been no visible reprieve. No season of rest that might feel like a reward for the life he had lived. No sense that things had been made right before he died.

Her aunt, by contrast, remained. Alive, but dependent. Difficult, and now more so. As she spoke, a conclusion began to take shape—not consciously, not deliberately, but with the quiet inevitability of a thought that has been forming beneath the surface for some time. The good ones suffer. The difficult ones remain. The ones who deserved peace never seemed to receive it.

It is important to recognize that this kind of conclusion does not arise from a failure of faith. It is, rather, an expression of the mind’s deep need for meaning. We are not made to endure chaos indefinitely. When suffering arrives quickly and without resolution—when sadness is compounded upon sadness—we begin, almost instinctively, to assemble fragments into a narrative that can be borne. We reach for meaning as one struggles for air.

However.

Not everything that feels like truth is truth. Sometimes it is simply pain, arranging itself into a story that allows us to keep going. And because of this, the most important work in such a moment is not to correct the story, but to slow it down.

The Work of Slowing Down

Clarity does not come from adding more information to an overwhelmed mind. It comes from creating space. So instead of asking about logistics or next steps, we asked a quieter question, one that shifted the focus from what was happening externally to what was unfolding within her.

What has been the hardest part of this for you emotionally?

There was a pause, and then, gradually, the deeper story began to emerge. It was not, finally, about the stroke or the funeral arrangements or even the weight of caregiving. It was about something older, something that had not been fully named.

It was about her mother.

Her mother, who had also been good, also patient, also quietly self-giving. Her mother, who had lived alongside a man who did not cherish her as he should have, who had not protected or honored her in the ways she deserved. Her mother, who had borne her own share of quiet suffering and who, in the end, had died without any sense that things had been made right.

In that moment, what had appeared to be a present crisis revealed itself as something far more layered. This was not simply grief responding to current events. It was grief remembering itself.

The Grief Beneath the Grief

One of the central insights in both coaching and spiritual accompaniment is that we are rarely responding only to the present moment. What we experience now is often interwoven with what has come before, especially when earlier wounds have not been fully processed or brought into the light. A new loss does not arrive alone. It gathers with it the weight of prior sorrows, drawing them into the present and giving them a new voice.

Read more

When a loss happens in a woman’s life—a death, a divorce, a betrayal, an estrangement—there is a moment when the way that woman loves begins to change. There is no clear, dramatic announcement. She might not even truly notice it herself. But it happens. And it is profound.

She becomes more careful. She listens intently for shifts in tone. She hesitates before saying something that might cause friction. She starts anticipating the reactions of the people around her, trying to keep everything smooth and steady.

To the outside world, it may look like kindness or maturity or emotional intelligence. It may even look like wisdom. But very often, what shapes these choices is something else entirely.

Fear.

The quiet kind of fear that emerges after you have learned something painful about life: the people you love can be lost.

In the second workshop of our Lenten series on Ruth and Naomi, we turned our attention to a brief but revealing moment in the first chapter of Ruth. Naomi has already endured devastating loss. Her husband is gone. Both of her sons have died. She is penniless. The life she built in Moab has collapsed around her.

As she prepares to return to Bethlehem, her two daughters-in-law begin walking with her. And Naomi stops them and urges them to go back.

At first glance, her words sound practical and even generous. She tells them they should return to their fathers’ homes. She points out that she has no more sons to offer them as husbands. She insists that their chances for a secure future would be far better in Moab than with her. There is some cultural truth to that whole way of thinking. But beneath the practical reasoning lies something deeper.

Naomi is afraid of causing more loss. And she is very afraid of losing more.

Read more

Hello!

Tomorrow, March 11, we will continue our Lenten coaching workshop series in the Take Up Membership Community.

In the opening chapter of Ruth, Naomi urges her daughters-in-law to return home. At first glance, her words sound practical—even generous. But underneath them lies something many women recognize: the quiet fear that loving someone might only lead to more loss.

When we have experienced deep rupture—estrangement, abandonment, divorce, or a life that unfolded very differently than we expected—it can change the way we love the people who remain.

We may begin walking on eggshells, avoiding conflict, or carrying the emotional weight of everyone around us, trying to prevent another fracture in the family.

In this session, we will explore Naomi’s moment of fear in Ruth 1:11–13 and consider how loss reshapes the nervous system and our relationships. Together, we’ll look at patterns like fear-based accommodation, over-functioning, and the exhaustion that can come when we try to hold everything together.

This is a compassionate conversation about why these patterns emerge—and how Lent invites us to slowly release the illusion of control and entrust the future to God.

Join us as we continue Naomi’s story and reflect on how the fear of further loss can quietly shape our lives—and how grace begins to loosen its grip.

The Live Take Up Community will meet live on Zoom at 9:30 Eastern Daylight Saving Time for this coaching workshop. Please join us—details here!

Or, if you don’t want access to live meetings + replays, Substack paid subscribers will receive detailed written notes after the workshop. God willing, you’ll have the notes in your inbox tomorrow evening.

In our Lenten coaching workshop last week, we lingered in one small line from the book of Ruth:

“Do not call me Naomi; call me Mara.”

At first glance, it sounds like a simple expression of grief. But the longer we sat with Naomi’s words, the more we realized she was doing something many of us do without noticing—she was letting her suffering rename her. The conversation that followed was honest and hopeful. What follows is a reflection drawn from that morning: not the whole workshop, but the heart of it.

The first chapter of Ruth contains one of the most human moments in all of Scripture. Naomi has returned to Bethlehem after years away. She left during the famine with a husband and two sons. Now she comes back with none of them. Her husband has died. Her sons have died. The life she imagined is gone. When the women of the town see her, they are startled and curious: Is this Naomi?

Naomi answers with a sentence that is both painfully honest and quietly revealing. “Do not call me Naomi; call me Mara, for the Almighty has dealt very bitterly with me” (Ruth 1:20). Naomi means pleasant. Mara means bitter. In the wake of devastating loss, Naomi renames herself.

That instinct—to interpret ourselves through our pain—is profoundly human. During our workshop conversation, one participant noticed something striking about Naomi’s response. In her grief, she does not lash out at the townspeople. She does not accuse the neighbors who remained safely in Bethlehem. Instead, she turns inward and defines herself according to what she has suffered.

Many of us recognized that impulse immediately.

When loss shatters the life we thought we were living, the hardest part is often not only the loss itself but the disorientation that follows. The story we thought we were inhabiting collapses. The future we quietly assumed becomes uncertain. The assumptions we built our days around—about marriage, children, family, or stability—no longer hold. Human beings are meaning-making creatures. We are story-shaped people who instinctively search for coherence when the narrative falls apart.

When the heart cannot control the event, it often tries to control the interpretation. One of the quickest ways to restore a sense of order is to make the pain part of identity. If I am the one who failed, then the outcome at least makes sense. If I am the difficult one, then estrangement becomes understandable. If I am the woman whose family did not turn out as planned, then the story has a kind of logic to it.

Predictable pain can feel safer than unanswered questions. Uncertainty is profoundly destabilizing, whereas self-blame offers the illusion of leverage. If the problem somehow lies within me, then perhaps I could have prevented the outcome. If I had prayed harder. If I had handled that conversation differently. If I had been softer, wiser, or more attentive.

Read more

Some of the women I coach carry an instinct to metabolize life before presenting it to others. They do not speak from the raw center of uncertainty. They speak from the processed edge, where things have shape, meaning, and containment. This instinct is not pathological; it is protective. It is often born in earlier seasons of life when their steadiness was necessary for everyone else’s survival.

Women who like to have everything tidy before presenting it often were children who grew up in chaos and uncertainty. They want their grown-up life to be stable. And they want no emotional uncertainty for their children–even if those children are grown.

So, they endeavor to live a calm, emotionally stable life, at least outwardly. When children were small, and the crises came in waves, and there was no one else to hold the center, they became the ones who could absorb uncertainty without amplifying it.

They became the translators. The stabilizers. The interpreters of chaos.

And over time, this became not just something they did, but someone they were.

The steady one.

The reliable one.

The one who didn’t fall apart in front of others.

So when uncertainty comes now—medical uncertainty, especially, but also financial uncertainty or job insecurity—the instinct is not to share it immediately. The instinct is to hold it quietly until it resolves into something nameable. Until it becomes safe. Until it becomes, once again, something they can say without trembling.

But something shifts when children become adults.

Read more

There is a particular kind of conversation that leaves you feeling strangely untethered. You walk in feeling grounded and comfortable. Clear. Calm, even.

And yet somewhere along the way, you find yourself talking more than you intended, explaining details that don’t really matter. Backtracking. Clarifying tone. Clarifying intent. Clarifying things you never would have thought needed clarifying. Your pulse rate increases. Heat creeps up your neck. Your voice goes up an octave.

Maybe you cry.

And you are not proud of the way you handled that.

You leave the conversation replaying it in your mind, wondering what happened. Wondering how you lost your footing. Over and over again on a loop, you play it back inside your head, and you feel defeated in so many ways.

Most women I coach know this feeling intimately.

Recently, we revisited a simple acronym that can be surprisingly life-changing once you understand it: Don’t JADE.

Do not:
Justify
Argue
Defend
Explain

At first glance, this can sound harsh. Aren’t we supposed to communicate clearly? Aren’t we supposed to repair misunderstandings? Aren’t we supposed to clarify what we mean so we can reach a new level of knowing one another?

Yes. Of course.

But the deeper wisdom of this principle is not about becoming silent. It’s about becoming discerning.

Because not every conversation is the same. And not every moment inside a relationship is the same.

There are relationships where explanation creates intimacy. Where a simple, “Let me clarify what I meant,” brings relief and reconnection. Where both people are genuinely trying to understand each other. In those spaces, words are bridges. Explanation is generosity. Those moments are expansive, and you know you’ve done something good in them.

And then there are other moments. Sometimes with the very same person.

Moments where the emotional temperature is too high. Where the other person is dysregulated, defensive, or already operating from a fixed narrative about you. Where your words are not being received as offerings, but as material to be examined, corrected, or turned against you.

This is where many women get stuck.

Because the instinct, especially if you are a verbal processor, is to try harder. To find better words. To explain more clearly. To restore the truth of who you are through language.

But here is the shift that changes everything:

Read more

Sometimes the most spiritually demanding work we do isn’t public. It isn’t impressive, and it doesn’t even look dramatic. You might not even notice it, and that might be a sign of its success.

Sometimes, spiritually demanding work looks like preparing for a family visit.

Recently, in group coaching, we talked about something many women quietly navigate: an upcoming visit with a volatile family member. In this case, the parent has a history of unpredictability, criticism, and attempts to wedge herself between husband and wife. There are also neurodivergent children in the home—children who feel emotional instability more intensely than most.

The client’s goal was simple:

“I just want peace.”

But peace in situations like this is not the same as harmony. It is not the same thing as approval. And it certainly isn’t the same thing as changing the other person.

So what does peace look like when the person coming through your front door is not peaceful?

Read more

Today’s group coaching conversation was one of those quiet ones that organically grew out of a place of trust and camaraderie. We touched on a very hot topic, and yet there were no fireworks. No dramatic villain narratives. No one stormed out of the room.

Just thoughtful women sitting with something tender:

We talked about a generation that feels vigilant. We talked about a generation that feels displaced and misunderstood. We talked about grief that masquerades as control. And fear that masquerades as distance.

We did it carefully and with kindness. We did it while holding ourselves and each other to a standard of the gospel.

That’s something I want to say plainly about our coaching spaces:

We are not here to diagnose the people who aren’t in the room. We are not here to rehearse grievances. We are not here to sharpen our arguments.

We are here to pursue holiness.

The Cultural Moment We’re In

“Boundaries” is a good word. I think that it first came into common usage when lots of Christian women were reading the Cloud and Townsend book.

It has helped many women untangle themselves from dynamics that were unhealthy or enmeshed or quietly damaging. But like all good tools, boundaries can be misapplied.

Sometimes what one generation calls a boundary, another experiences as a wall.

Sometimes what one generation calls love, another experiences as intrusion.

And often — far more often than we admit — both sides are acting out of fear.

Millennial and Gen Z women, especially, have been formed to guard:

• Emotional autonomy

• The primacy of their marriage

• Patterns they worked hard not to repeat

• Their children’s psychological safety

Older generations often carry quieter fears:

• Becoming irrelevant

• Losing closeness

• Watching traditions dissolve

• The dissolution of the family culture

Neither side is evil.

Both are afraid.

And fear builds structures.

What We Did in Coaching

We didn’t strategize how to “get around” anyone’s walls, we didn’t rehearse clever comeback scripts.

Instead, we asked deeper questions:

• What grief do I need to process so I don’t hand it to her?

• Where might I be reacting instead of responding?

• Can I remove competition from the marriage entirely?

• What would steadiness look like here?

• How can we let go of defensiveness and focus on building trust instead?

Steadiness is not weakness.

It is emotional maturity. It is the decision not to mirror rigidity with rigidity.

It is the refusal to triangulate, scorekeep, or withdraw into wounded silence. It is learning to say, in word and in posture:

“I am not fragile.
I am not competing.
I am here.
And I will not escalate this.”

That kind of presence is deeply disarming.

Something We Hold Sacred

In these sessions, we protect privacy fiercely.

Stories are never shared outside the room.
Details are never repackaged.
People are never reduced to caricatures or avatars.

What you will always find instead is this:

We turn the mirror gently back toward ourselves.

Not to assign blame, but to reclaim agency. We bring each other back to what is genuinely our locus of control. We recognize where we have freedom and where we don’t.

Because we cannot control another person’s walls.

The Slow Work of Differentiated Love

One of the most beautiful insights from today was this:

Walls are often built by vigilance. They are put up by wounds we did not inflict.

And vigilance softens when it encounters trustworthiness over time.

Not persuasion.
Not pressure.
Not emotional intensity.

Just calm consistency.

That doesn’t guarantee the closeness you imagined. We spent some time acknowledging that there is profound grief in that.

But peace costs less than pressure. And maturity is quieter than most people expect.

What Coaching Is — and Isn’t

Coaching is not:

• A place to vent.

• A place to gather allies against someone.

• A place to craft ultimatums.

It is a place to:

• Strengthen your interior life.

• Increase your emotional regulation.

• Clarify your values.

• Practice differentiated love.

It is careful.
It is faithful.
It is often slower than people want.
And it is extraordinarily powerful.

If you’ve ever wondered what happens in those calls, now you know the heart of it.

Members of Take Up & Read can access today’s replay inside the portal.

Paid subscribers to this Substack will see notes like this every week.

For those who are simply reading here, I hope this gives you a sense of the tone we cultivate:

Calm.
Honest.
Protective of privacy.
Committed to growth in virtue.

We are not building louder women.

We are building more trustworthy ones.

And that changes families over time.

We had an interactive group coaching/workshop today to thoroughly discuss the ways in which we are slowly authored by what we read, watch, and welcome into our days.

It’s interesting; Grammarly wants me to change “authored” to “influenced.”

But I’ll stand firm. Authored it is. I want us to think differently than we do when we throw around the word “influencer.”

Here are some key points:

• Formation is:

  • Repetitive, not dramatic

  • Relational, not merely informational

  • A matter of attention, not willpower

• What we linger over shapes our inner world

• We are formed most deeply when we are:

  • Tired

  • Unguarded

  • Seeking comfort

This isn’t about becoming ‘better.’
It’s about becoming truer—and more free, more authentically who you are called to be.

Spiritual growth often begins not with trying harder, but with choosing more wisely what we let stay.

To see the video replay of this workshop and to join us for future workshops and bible studies, join the Take Up membership. Tomorrow, we are going to explore the stories of Hannah, Elizabeth, and Anna. We have bible study every Thursday, live at 9:30 eastern time.

Tomorrow, we look at one woman of the Old Testament and two in the New Testament—women who are not connected by temperament, circumstance, or even era.

They are connected by attention.

Each woman lives inside a story she did not choose.
Each woman resists letting those circumstances have the final word.
Each welcomes God before she receives what she longs for.

Together, they teach us that formation happens in the waiting, and that what we welcome during delay determines who we become after it.

While today’s workshop focused on the media we consume, tomorrow’s study is quieter. These women are gentle guides for modern women. They are each authored by longing, faithfulness, and attentiveness, not by outcomes, and certainly not by algorithms.

Join us!

The Take Up Membership met today for our first workshop of the year. We explored making resolutions that won’t fail. Below are notes for your perusal. Scroll to the end of this post for a video replay. And remember, you are welcome to join us live every Wednesday for coaching and Thursday for bible study. This week, we also have a live book club meeting Saturday morning.

Read more

Many women approach goal-setting with a familiar mix of hope and dread. Hope that this time things will be different. Dread because history suggests otherwise.

We’ve tried resolutions before. We’ve written lists. We’ve promised ourselves we would finally be more disciplined, more organized, more consistent. And when we fall short—as we inevitably do—we quietly add the failure to an already heavy interior ledger.

Let’s look again, through a different lens. Goals are not self-improvement projects; they are responses to grace. The Christian life is not about becoming impressive. It’s about becoming free, faithful, and available to God.

Catholic discernment offers us a different starting place. Before we ask What should I do?, we are invited to ask something more fundamental:

Is this goal leading me toward love—or toward pressure?

Discernment Is Not the Same as Decision-Making

Discernment is not simply choosing between good and bad options. Often, the real question is between two apparently good things—one that leads us toward freedom and one that subtly binds us.

Read more

At this time of year, as we prepare to gather and share with the people we hold dear—and with the obligatory people—there’s one kind of preparation that might be more important than all the others. Before we make the trip or set the table or pour the cocktails, we might consider forgiving.

What would this new Church year feel like if we walked into it unencumbered by the weight of old grievances?

Forgiveness is one of the hardest teachings of Christ—not because we don’t understand it, but because we do. Jesus is clear: “Forgive, as your Father has forgiven you” (cf. Luke 6:36; Ephesians 4:32). We pray these words every time we say the Our Father. And yet, when a wound is real—especially when it is repeated, unacknowledged, or unresolved—our hearts resist. We might think we’re trying to forgive, but the hurt keeps returning like a tide.

What Forgiveness Is—and What It Isn’t

Part of our struggle comes from misunderstanding forgiveness. We may think it means pretending something didn’t happen. Or that it requires instant trust. Or that we must suppress our pain to appear holy. We imagine that if we truly forgive, we’ll pack the grievance neatly away—tied with a ribbon, hidden in a box—and never feel the sting again.

But that’s not what Christ or His Church asks of us.

The Catechism calls forgiveness a work of mercy and reminds us that mercy is the fruit of charity (CCC 1829; 2447). That means forgiveness is not something we manufacture through strength of will. It is something God grows in us. It begins with opening our hands—sometimes literally—to let God help us do what we cannot do on our own.

Forgiveness is not force.
It is surrender.

Forgiveness and Reconciliation Are Not the Same

Another truth that often brings deep relief: forgiveness and reconciliation are not identical.

Forgiveness is something we can do with God, even if the other person is not ready—or not safe—to engage. It is the decision to release the debt someone owes us and place justice, healing, and restoration into God’s hands.

Reconciliation, by contrast, requires mutual change. It involves rebuilding trust and repairing relationship. It cannot happen unilaterally. And sometimes—because of addiction, abuse, dishonesty, or entrenched patterns—reconciliation is not possible right now.

Read more

There is a particular weight to regret that women often carry quietly.

It slips into the small hours of the night. It rises in the middle of ordinary moments—folding laundry, driving to the grocery store, scrolling through a photo that brings back a memory we wish we could revise. It sounds like If only… and I should have… and Why didn’t I…

Regret has a way of haunting the present with the past.

And for women of faith, regret can feel especially complicated. We believe in redemption, mercy, and resurrection, but we still struggle to believe that our own stories qualify for those great gifts. We know, in our heads, that God makes all things new. But our hearts often remain stuck in what we wish had been different.

This week in our live group coaching space, we spent time gently opening the subject of regret. Not to rehearse shame. Not to relive old wounds. But to ask a different, braver question:

What if regret is not meant to be a life sentence—but an invitation?

Regret Is Not the Same as Shame

One of the most important distinctions we explored is the difference between regret and shame.

Regret says, Something wasn’t aligned with love or truth or goodness.
Shame says, I am defective.

Regret can be a signal. It can awaken conscience, tenderness, and desire for growth. Shame, on the other hand, freezes us. It tells us it’s too late. That we missed God’s will permanently. That the story is already written, and it’s not a good one.

But shame is not the voice of God.

Scripture is filled with people who carry very real regret—Peter, who denied Christ; Paul, who persecuted the Church; the Samaritan woman, who tried again and again to find belonging in the wrong places; Mary Magdalene, whose past did not get the final word. Their regret became the very soil where grace grew abundantly.

The enemy uses regret to trap us in the past.
God uses regret to invite us into transformation.

The Regret Traps Many Women Fall Into

So many of us unknowingly fall into the same quiet mental traps:

• “If I had chosen differently back then, everything would be better now.”
  This places an inordinate weight on one past decision and quietly shrinks the power of God in the present.

• “If I had done better, my child/my marriage/my health would be different.”
  This confuses influence with control and love with omnipotence.

• “I wasted too much time. It’s too late for me now.”
  As if God’s redemption operates on a human expiration date.

These thoughts feel convincing. They sound responsible. They masquerade as accountability. But underneath them often lies fear—not faith.

Fear that we are beyond repair.
Fear that God’s goodness is for other people.
Fear that we were supposed to get it right the first time.

But Scripture tells a different story. Over and over again, God meets people not at the moment of their perfection—but at the moment of their return.

A Gentle Way to Look at Regret Without Letting It Rule You

In our coaching space, we used a simple prayer-journal practice to look at regret without being consumed by it. I want to share it with you here, because even done on your own, it can be deeply freeing.

Choose one regret that feels present for you right now—one that feels tender but not overwhelming.

Then, in your journal, reflect on these five movements:

1. The Facts/What You Did or Didn’t Do
What actually happened—just the observable details, without adjectives or self-criticism? Name only the actions, not what you think they “say” about you as a person. Just report the story.

2. The Story You’ve Been Telling Yourself
What meaning have you attached to this moment? If the first step was reporting, this is the headline. What’s the banner over this story for you?
“I failed.”
“I ruined everything.”
“I should have known better.”

3. What You Feel
Name the emotions honestly—sadness, grief, guilt, anger, fear, disappointment. Do a brain dump—or a heart dump. List all the things the thought in Step 2 makes you feel.

4. What You Didn’t Know or Have Then
This is where compassion begins to soften regret.
What support, maturity, healing, understanding, or stability did you not yet have at the time?

So often, we judge our younger selves using information we only received later.

5. God’s Invitation Now
Not what you should have done then—but what God may be inviting you into now.
A conversation.
A boundary.
Rest.
Confession.
Forgiveness.
A new habit.
A brave step forward.

This simple reframing does something powerful: it moves regret out of the courtroom and into the presence of Christ.

Placing Regret at the Cross

Now, imagine physically placing your regrets at the foot of the Cross.

Not pretending they didn’t matter.
Not minimizing their impact.
But allowing Jesus to stand inside the story with us again and say, “I was there. I am here. And nothing is beyond My mercy.”

So many women carry regret as if Jesus is standing at a distance with crossed arms. But the Gospel shows us a Savior who steps directly into the places of embarrassment, failure, grief, and loss.

He does not ask you to deny what was hard.
He asks you not to carry it alone anymore.

Your Past Is Not the Ceiling on Your Future

One of the most subtle lies regret tells is that your most painful chapter is also your final one or that it determines every new one.

But God is not finished—not with you, not with your relationships, not with your story, not with what feels wasted.

Redemption is not about erasing the past.
It is about assigning new meaning to it. (This is not the same thing as rewriting history.)

• The wounds you wish you could undo often become the places where compassion deepens.

• The decisions you regret sometimes become the very reason you now choose differently.

• The seasons you would never repeat often become the places where your faith matures from idea to lived reality.

A Prayer You Can Carry This Week

If regret has been heavy on your heart, I invite you to carry this simple prayer with you:

Jesus, I bring You what I cannot change and what I wish were different.
I trust You with the past I cannot fix and the future I cannot control.
Teach me what I need to learn.
Heal what still aches.
And lead me forward in freedom. Amen.

And then ask yourself one gentle question:

What is one small, faithful step God may be inviting me to take this week?

Not ten steps.
Not a life overhaul.
Just the next right one.

For those who are full Take Up members or part of the Founding Circle on Substack, this week’s live coaching session opened space for personal sharing, real-time guidance, and discernment around regret and forward movement. These notes are offered here so that even if you weren’t in the room, you can share the path forward.

Because no matter where you find yourself today, this much is true:

Your worst moment is not your truest identity.
Your regret is not stronger than God’s mercy.
And your story is still being written.